14th Colony

Wed 19 November 2008

14thC: Membership has it's privileges - Register Free


Subscribe via email!

Get the latest 14th Colony content delivered to your inbox. Just enter your email address:

 Subscribe in a reader


Subscribe with Bloglines Add to Technorati Favorites



Search 14th Colony


Advertise on 14th Colony!


Spread your message!


SEO Articles

Y.A. top 10 list of SEO “DOs & DON’Ts”…

Wit
by Wit
December 2nd, 2007

… but this one is not meant to educate the masses.

Of course, the search engine officials are telling us SEOs to keep things clean and to follow the rules. And really, we want to follow the rules and keep our little white hat unstained. Honest guv’, we do. At least we want everyone else to follow those rules and be good. However, we are living in the fast lane and we can’t be arsed to write 150 pages of greatness, and then wait for people and search engines to pick up on those in an all-natural way. Nah, we really need a good dollop of grey on our hats to get ahead. And I don’t mean pigeon poo.

First grown-up step on the SEO ladder is often to visit forums and read, or even sign up. That’s great. SEO forums come in all shapes and sizes and shades of hat, ranging from angelic white like Doug’s forum to infra-black like Earl’s. Then again: you’re not that extreme. You just want your pages to rank decently. The following list will take 10 of the most common whitehat SEO myths and will add to those a grain of salt (or more) in order to turn them into real-life SEO tips.

1. Content is king.
Hahahaha. Move on to the next one please. Ok, for the record: nowadays you cannot rank any page without links. However, you can rank any page with targetted links. Just add your favourite keyword on the page once to dodge the google bombing filter eh.

2. Pagerank is dead.
It is not. On Google, you need pagerank to get anywhere. The other search engines use similar algorithms. Common denominator is links. Nice, proper <A HREF=”…”> links. Doesn’t matter what the anchor text is (at this point), just get the backlink. However, don’t believe all you see on the Google toolbar. The pagerank indicator does not necessarily correspond with the actual and correct pagerank of the page you’re viewing. In fact I have uninstalled the toolbar a long time ago, effectively freeing up space that belonged to the webpages I was viewing in the first place. Liberating, I tell you.

3. Rewrite your pages to have .html extensions.
In the days of yore, some search engine bots would ease off crawling dynamic pages like .php and .asp. If only to prevent server overloads crashing the site in question. These days, it doesn’t really matter anymore. Furthermore, what’s the use of getting your pages crawled every day when in fact they haven’t changed for months? Just leave the .php extensions on, and even the query strings if you feel like it. Spend your time more wisely.

4. Don’t link out to a “bad neighbourhood”.
Oh please. As long as you’re not linking back and forth within the very worst of link spamming networks, then the odd dodgy link won’t hurt your webpage or website one bit. (Sorry, no real-life example here.)

5. Avoid shared servers and go for dedicated IPs.
Again, unless you host your entire blackhat crosslinking network on there, a shared server is not going to do you any harm. Keep in mind that the majority of websites are on shared servers. The search engines have grown accustomed to them. Better yet: why not browse your server’s IP for domains and pick a couple of nice and clean websites made by others and link to them?

6. Don’t buy links. And if you sell links, use rel=”nofollow”.
This rule needs to be adjusted. Ok, bought links are frowned upon, officially. However, if enough care is taken to avoid leaving the usual “footprint” of bought links, then buy away if you have the money to spare.

7. Keep your “keyword density” around 5%.
Duh. Even Randfish knows this is not true. Some landing pages for flash sites have a keyword density of 50 - 100% and still rank tops. There is no such thing as a fixed, ideal keyword density.

8. DMOZ is dead.
Ok it may not be as powerful as it used to be, but if you have 15 minutes to spare, come up with a nice title and description and submit your website. Who knows eh? Don’t go overboard though: most dmoz editors have day jobs and some take months to update their categories. Don’t bug them. Umm ok bug them a little but not too often.

9. Don’t use CSS like “visibility:hidden” or “display:none”.
True, spammy hidden text is icky. What’s more, it isn’t even that effective. But don’t believe the myth that just using css like that will get your pages penalised. There are many legitimate uses for hidden content on web pages, dynamic menus being one of them. Just make sure it will never come to a “manual review”.

10. Use valid code.
Nice to aim for. Not necessary for good rankings. Keep in mind that half of mankind has an IQ of less than 100 and is truly puzzled by all but the simplest html code. People just do their best at writing html, but can’t be expected to be perfect. Search engine spiders have adapted to that, and they are very lenient. If your pages are already indexed and ranking nicely, validating your code won’t improve things. On a side note: if you are using <TABLE>s and are happy with how your pages look and behave, then don’t be tempted to rewrite them to clean css. Really, the bots can’t be arsed about tables or css.

Ok that’s enough for now, let’s stop before this turns into a multipage rant. Top 10s read better than top 30s anyway. Just stay tuned for more :)



Microsoft still referral spamming, jacking Adsense

Randall McCarley
by Randall McCarley
November 14th, 2007

This story broke in August but it’s heating up again because MSN is still up to something.

MSN has been referral spamming websites. This means they “ping” a site with a bot acting like a human and leaving a link in the referral logs back to MSN’s website.

Spammers do this hoping you will check your logs and follow the links back to their site where you will make a purchase, click an ad, etc. MSN claims this is a “quality check” but what kind of QC wreaks havoc on your primary competitor’s ad program?

Microsoft’s bots are triggering some javascript including the one used for Google Adsense. You may recall that the click through rate determines the quality (value per click) of ads placed on your sites. With MSN’s referral spamming they are racking up impressions but not clicks damaging your CTR and ultimately, income. Continue Microsoft still referral spamming, jacking Adsense »



The further devaluation of Google PR

Randall McCarley
by Randall McCarley
October 25th, 2007

Google was built around PageRank. For a long time, SEOs would focus on getting high PR scores to rank well but that ended a few years ago when Google’s algorithm advanced. Now PR does have an effect on several things but it hasn’t been the place to focus legitimate SEO efforts for a while.

The question was recently raised, “should we care about PR?” My answer is “very little.” Here’s why:

If a website has PR it is most likely ok with Google and included in the index and results pages. That means it has influence within Google’s system and can be useful for getting relevant links.

Pages with PR stay out of the supplemental results… but we can’t see which pages are in the supplemental results anymore so I don’t think that is worth worrying about.

There’s some disagreement about this but pages with high PR scores get crawled more often than pages with low PR scores. This makes sense as PR is a metric of popularity and Google’s algo depends on popularity so they may as well focus their resources on these “valued” pages.

Mostly PR is considered valuable because people think it is! Most of the people buying links based on PR don’t really understand what it is or what the influence of PR is on the search results. SEOs call this “chasing the green tail”.

Over the last week Google has been dropping the PR scores of suspected link sellers. I suppose the idea is that if these sites are selling links based on PR Google can cut into their profits. Fair enough, but this trick hurts the credibility of PR more than anything because now we know the scores can be manually altered. These sites still show some PR. We know they aren’t banned. And so far all reports say Google referral traffic is steady so there is no real penalty. Continue The further devaluation of Google PR »



The 14th Colony Transfer Project

Randall McCarley
by Randall McCarley
October 16th, 2007

Enough complaining about what didn’t work, here’s the process I went through to relaunch 14th Colony into the cleaner, more professional (and already looking more profitable) website you see before you.

First, some background…

When 14thC was first launched I was putting out a new layout every 3 months or so. This was reactive to the growth and new directions for the site. When 14thC.com was first launched it was as a notebook for my own research and ideas about search engine optimization. The initial site was made of static HTML pages. As the amount of content grew this became insane to keep updated so I changed things to PHP to use includes for the basic site structure and then hacked the .htaccess to keep the page URLs the same (with .html at the end instead of .php) for the search engines.

This was ok for a while but then I added the blog. The blog was in a separate directory. I was never really satisfied with this as I didn’t really have a home page for the site, instead just pulling the RSS feed and stuffing some content around it.

By the time I added some new pages like Services and the Interviews things were getting a bit cluttered. Microsoft launched a new version of Internet Explorer that inexplicably broke the header design for just the blog… even though the code was the same as the rest of the site.

“I’ll fix that soon,” I told myself, busy with client work.

Finally the day came where I was meeting with a client and explaining what a blog is and how it works. I brought up my own site to show him the Dashboard and how the content displayed. Looking at the site with a client embarrassed me. Here was hundreds of pages about how a website should work but the usability was poor. I had learned a lot about SEO - and posted about it - that was not in practice on my own site. Continue The 14th Colony Transfer Project »



Weaning off Google

Randall McCarley
by Randall McCarley
October 8th, 2007

I have made the switch from Google to Yahoo! as my default search engine. You may notice I have changed the site search function on this blog over as well.

While I think Google offers great products their ethics are wanting and I just don’t want to support them any more than I have to. There’s a good list of Google alternatives at Gevil.org if you are interested in reducing your reliance on Google.

You will notice that I have left Google Adsense up. While I take issue with some of Google’s policies I am still a businessman first. Until I find a service that comes close to pulling the same revenue I get with Adsense I won’t change that over. There’s a difference between making a protest and being stupid. Unfortunately YPN does not stack up in this arena.

However, I am happy to report that Yahoo! Search is proving to be much more reliable than Google’s. I’ve been hearing reports that Yahoo! has a higher satisfaction rate and can now see why - it just works!

While this was a personal choice for me I’d like to encourage you to try some other search engines as well. Here’s the big ones to look at:

There are some smaller and niche search engines you may want to try out as well:

The real issue at heart here for me is building the free internet I want instead of capitulating to the demands of a monopolistic empire. With more than 50% of the market share for search alone, Google is using its size to bully websites into falling in line with ‘policy’ - no matter how hypocritical the new policies are when stacked against Google’s mission statement, webmaster guidelines and public image.

My protest is a small one. I’m hopeful that this message will reach you and inspire you to try something different. If Google’s market share gets affected they will have to address their policies. I’m hopeful Google will go back to being a great service provider and their attempt to architect, engineer or police what the masses want online will stop.

Thank you for your support!

Update: Thanks to this great post by Ben, I have checked out a couple Adsense alternatives and settled on BidVertiser for now. That makes this site one big step closer to being Google-free!



« Previous Entries   Next Entries »